Positions Revisited

I want to revisit some of my stock decisions and see what was the outcome and analyze if there is anything I should have done better. I will try to be intellectually honest with my assessments and recognize my errors. Also i want to look back and see if there are any mental traps that affected my decisions and recognize when i fall for these psychological biases.

Below is all the positions that I have talked about on this blog for over a year or so. All are businesses that I looked to own but did not or I bought and sold.

General Growth (GGPWQ): I have dismissed the value in this name when it was trading at $.35. now the stock is over $4.5 an impressive 600%+ return. Was I wrong? Off course I was. Would I do the same decision again? Probably yes. There is nothing inherently wrong in how I analysed the situation. I came to the conclusion that there is a probability of permanent loss of capital; this probability excluded the equity of GGP right away.

I honestly can live with the consequences of such decisions. I prefer to err on the side of preserving capital than take a speculative position like General Growth.

Coach (COH): I liked the business and its management but I decided I will only buy at $18 or below to give me enough margin of safety. Coach is trading at $33; some 80% return if I have gone ahead and bough at my buy decision.

My inaction cost me here. This one hurts more than General Growth because there was no reason not to buy. I scummed to the fear and paralysis during the market tumble earlier this year. My bias for the status-quo and regret avoidance have cost me.

Hawk Drilling (HAWK): I did not like this spin-off for various reasons. However, the stock has gone from $22 to $35 in the span of several weeks. The business has a lot of ugly factors in it, which is what you want to buy in a spin-off. But again this one I can live with. The price has gone up not to the specifics of the company but because of movement in natural gas as evident of a similar move by its competitor Hero Drilling as seen in the chart; Natural Gas has also moved from $2.7 mcf to $3.7 during the same period. I concluded that this was a leveraged play on Natural Gas and I did not want to call its direction.

Switch of Bank of America to American Express: After BofA bought Merill Lynch I decided to get out and switch to AMEX. My analysis were right that BofA would have tough time with Merill and I am better with a company that have a great brand name and much more easily understood and analysed than a bank. AMEX return 65% from the switch to BofA -14%.

In this instance I did not have any status-quo bias I acted and I did not have a loss aversion bias. I hope I can have the same capacity to perform the same decision in similar situations.

Preferreds (Brookfield and Bombardier) and Senior Loans Positions: I have bought several positions with the credit theme to be a better proposition than equity. All worked very well with most of them 70% gains plus their yield.

However, equity performed very well since its March lows. All my buying from late 2008 to early 2009 has been tilted toward credit instruments rather than equities. There were several companies that I liked that could have provided me with handsome returns over the last six months. Again, some paralysis on my part to pull the trigger on stocks with attractive prices, similar to Coach above.

Teck Resources (TCK): This position has worked as I expected. The assets were too valuable. When it was trading at $4, I did not think there was any chance of loss of capital. Now that the stock is trading at $30 it still has some room to high 30s.

However I made a silly mental error. I sold too early and left a lot of profit on the table by halving my position. The business did not hit my value estimate and I reacted to the price run and I fell to regret avoidance mode. I should have asked what is the value?

FirstService (FSV): I sold at 8% loss when I realized I made several errors in valuation and business model assessment. My mistake here is that those assessment should have been made before hand not afterwards. I rushed to take advantage of price decline before the opportunity escapes me. Little I know the price declined further. Here it was a process violation; the position should have never been established and because of the error I am 8% poorer.

NorthStar Realty (NRF): I am down some 50% on this one. I can be wrong on this one but I followed my process and my thesis still good. I am willing to hang onto it until I see another opportunity with better return profile.

Sears Holding (SHLD): I am down 30% on this position. Again so far I am wrong and the intrinsic value has declined with the name as its real estate assets have went down in value. Moreover, I realize now that valuation discount alone is not enough it has to be coupled with good business model and economics.

Cardinal Health, Peyto Energy, and Burlington Northern: All of these positions are recent and any analysis is not worth its trouble.

I just wonder how this post would have been different if the market have not rallied. I come to remember the quote " rising tide lifts all boats". So I am thankful that I did well but I always think that there is an element of luck in my decisions.

Exiting Bank Loans (PHD)

The run up in high yield and credit was incredible. Actually most credit instruments have performed better than equity. If you look at the performance of high yield index and leveraged loans they have outperformed S&P as can be seen in the chart below:

Actually most credit indices have gotten to the same pricing level of September last year. For example, LCDX, a leveraged loan index I have used to price Senior Bank Loan is priced now around 94 cents on the dollar, a similar price to where it was trading before Sep 2008, while its level in December were 70 cents on the dollar. That is some appreciation.

I am afraid that there are still a lot of risks in the economy and corporate leverage to warrant a price level to pre September 2008 levels. Also recoveries are below norm due to the high leverage, which lessen the attractiveness. That's why I will take my money out of PHD, senior bank loans closed end fund, right now. I may be early to sell but I do not like how far and quick the run up in the price. Also a 50% capital appreciation plus dividends is not something to sneeze at.

Debt with Equities Like Returns

Debt seems to be a theme for me over this year. most of my purchases were in debt related instruments. I have invested in Commercial real estate debt, bank loans and the quasi debt preferred shares.

1. Purchase of bank loan Close-end-fund PHD at $6.75:

The Credit markets recovered over the few weeks particularly in the non government debt. Some of the funds that I was analyzing for investment in bank loans have moved up, some by 30%. The spread on bank loans have come down significantly from few days ago as displayed
in the chart.

There are a lot of improving signs in the credit environment:

• LIBOR is came down and it should provide significant debt service relief
  
• Mortgages are down to historic rates
  
• Corporate yields are down indicating trust in corporate paper or at least some money is moving into that market.
  
• even high yield rates have gone down.
• all this is accomplished with treasuries at historic lows still, i.e. the spreads are still the same but yields have came down because people are buying and capital is flowing into the credit market rather than treasuries.

2. Commercial Real Estate Debt:
I have bought NorthStar Realty (NRF), maybe prematurely in hindsight but I still like it, to capitalize on the cheapness of commercial real estate debt.

From Bloomberg:

Top-rated commercial-mortgage bonds, which returned 32 percentage points less than Treasuries in October and November, have offered a record 12 percentage points more than government notes through Dec. 24, Barclays Capital index data show.

Debt markets are improving amid hopes that prices fell enough to account for potential defaults and as the U.S. government continues efforts to thaw credit and curb a yearlong recession. One of the AAA classes of a $7.6 billion 2007 Goldman Sachs Group Inc. commercial-mortgage-bond deal, considered a market benchmark, has jumped 24 percent, according to Ken Hackel, head of fixed-income strategy at RBS Greenwich Capital Markets.

I am considering to double down in the new year on the name; I am waiting for the possible dividend cut first. NRF will make it through this crises and will have high odds of making high returns:

• The company has $326 million in cash while its market cap is about $250 million.
  
• Its portfolio of loans are predominately prior to the 2005-2007 glut of weak underwriting and loose credit standards.
  
• It has underwritten all of its loans so it has first hand knowledge of its economics.
  
• Management owns 11% of the company so its interest is aligned with shareholders.
• It has a large portfolio of health related commercial real estate which is doing strongly and values are going up.
  

3. Preferred Shares
I have accumulated preferred shares in Bombardier and Brookfield Asset Management to take advantage of price volatility versus the credit worthiness and strength of their balance sheets. I will add to both of these positions in the future.

I think debt have sold off more than equities and was offering equities like return with much better security in the event of default. Investors have raced to buy Treasuries for no return and it will not be long that they will seek better yields in the credit markets.

I have an equity purchase that I will make in the new year and I anticipate to be a big chunk of my portfolio. I have been studying the company for over six months and I have gotten a very comfortable feel of its competitive advantage and prospect.

Hope you have a happy new years!